منابع مشابه
From systems for defeasible argumentation to dialogical systems of argumentation
Nonmonotonic reasoning is a reasoning in which temporary conclusions can be drawn on the basis of incomplete information but which might be withdrawn when more information becomes available. Systems for defeasible argumentation capture this kind of reasoning in terms of interactions between conflictual arguments. Nonmonotonic reasoning is explained in terms of defeasibility since arguments can ...
متن کاملTeleological argumentation to and from motives
This paper uses tools from argumentation and artificial intelligence to build a system to analyse reasoning from a motive to an action and reasoning from circumstantial evidence of actions to a motive. The tools include argument mapping, argumentation schemes, inference to the best explanation and a hybrid method of combining argument and explanation. Several examples of use of relevant motive ...
متن کاملAbstract argumentation semantics: from limits to perspectives
argumentation semantics: from limits to perspectives Pietro Baroni DII Dip. di Ingegneria dell’Informazione University of Brescia (Italy) Roadmap Introduction and review Dung’s framework is (almost) nothing A directed graph (called defeat graph) where: » arcs are interpreted as attacks » nodes are called arguments “by chance” (let say historical reasons) Dung’s framework is (almost) nothing
متن کاملFrom Argumentation Mining to Stance Classification
Argumentation mining and stance classification were recently introduced as interesting tasks in text mining. In this paper, a novel framework for argument tagging based on topic modeling is proposed. Unlike other machine learning approaches for argument tagging which often require large set of labeled data, the proposed model is minimally supervised and merely a one-to-one mapping between the p...
متن کاملFrom Logic Programming to Argumentation and Back
Argumentation has gained popularity in recent years as a knowledge representation formalism to support, in particular, non-monotonic and paraconsistent reasoning. I will trace back the origins of two well-known argumentation frameworks (namely abstact argumentation and assumption-based argumentation) to work on the semantics of logic programming and abductive logic programming in the late eight...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: journal of king abdulaziz university arts and humanities
سال: 2017
ISSN: 1658-4295,1319-0989
DOI: 10.4197/art.25-1.5